|
Something Sings in Blinding White
The Amazing Painting of Léopold Rabus Stands Apart from Our
Modern-Day Princes
With the thicket behind him on the path, he
noticed a large clump of earth that had been ripped from the embankment of
the meadow. At this place on theembankment, he could make out the combs of
a deserted wasp’s nest. In the middle of the crooked hill stood an old
shack, its walls bent inward so that the roof touched the ground. Adrian
passed along each of the walls, beating on them with a stick to drive out
any fox that might have made its home there. He also picked up a few
stones and threw them at the roof, breaking one or two of the slates at
once.¹ Franz Böni, “Der Dorffuhrmann”
No
Morels, but a Steep Climb
“No, they are not here yet,” Léopold
Rabus calls through the clear woods as he searches for morels among last
year’s leaves, flattened by the freshly melted snow. It is still too early
because the winter was the first real winter in years. He is joined once
more by his wife, Anna Hirsch, in the climb up the wooded slope, reaching
a small, single track heading north. In the blinding light of earliest
spring, between the barren, leafless trees, a stupendous view of the
snow-covered Alps presents itself in the distance, the unreal realism of
their jagged profile projected onto the horizon like a mirage. We make our
way in mid-ascent, in parallel with the Lac du Neuchâtel, with the hiking
routes of Jura above us and the crowded banks of the summer season below.
We are far from the tourist track, on a path trodden by just a few
wellinformed locals. We pass by two or three houses built in the 1960s and
safely hidden behind high thuja hedges. It is quiet here, very quiet.
Rabus raises his hand and points as a bare tree cracks. The hilly
pastureland is as yet unvisited by cattle. We approach a farmstead that
stretches out at either side of the pathway. A white horse stands in a
garage and turns its head, chewing and fixing us with its stare. Rabus
heads for a building to the right of the path, crossing trampled-down
grass and making me wonder what it is that he wants to show me here. It is
such a banal building, neither particularly old nor spectacularly
derelict, tired in a run-of-the-mill, unremarkable way and clearly no
longer in use. Even its purpose is impossible to identify: a former
agricultural building, or a one-time small workshop? He stops directly in
front of the building and points to the ground. It is only as I am
standing right next to him that I am surprised by an entrance that drops
sharply to a cellar below, unsafe, with no hand rail, the door wide open
and windows smashed. I suddenly recognize the motif of the painting Le
point d’eau (The Standpipe, 2008). Suddenly appearing, as if out of
nowhere, the picture stands before me and matches the banality of the
location. Of course Le point d’eau only achieves its drama from the figure
hanging precariously above the abyss and the tangled mass of hands and
arms adds to this effect, but the vision of this painting found its
starting point here; this is its naturally evolved “setting.” It is
astonishing to see how well the painted image captures the reality of the
location while transporting it to a completely different world in which
dreamlike qualities and melancholy merge along with romantic and
existential sensibilities. You do indeed get a clear sense of it on
location, but it is much more diffuse because there are far more things
around you that interfere with your concentration on this one view. On the
way back to the studio, we pass a turning that we last took in October
2008, when we parked the car on a nearby road, seeking out a rarely
visited building, half-hidden by a cluster of trees and renovated to serve
unknown purposes. As the crow flies, this place is no more than one
kilometer away from the cellar entrance we have just visited. Close to
this curious building, Rabus showed me another small house, half-overgrown
by brambles, where mattresses and detritus indicated fleeting overnight
stays. There was the smell of something stale and rotten fermenting
sweetly in the halflight of the room. Who last spent the night here? What
happened? What were the thoughts of those who stayed here? These are the
burning questions that cross your mind. This place has something of a
morbid persistence even, as time is trapped, forgotten and finally lost in
this tangle of thorns. And yet he always remains unmoved by the heaviness
and fragility of such places, accepting them as gifts with his own
habitual brightness and enthusiasm. This is no melancholy artist turning
in on himself; quite the contrary, his light, almost childlike optimism
stands out against the disturbing strangeness of the locations.
Read long version
|
Memento
A memory is nothing more than a number of electrical impulses, which are
fed from the hippocampus into the numerous layers of the cerebral cortex.
Every single one of these impulses leaves traces behind. Even when the
memory’s details have long faded away, the traces leave behind a hardly
recognizable path to the cerebral cortex. Perceptions of new experiences
evolve in the cerebral cortex and can lead to bizarre associations –
like a beaten pathway in a forest, which, after being left unused for
many years, is only perceivable in the undergrowth, waiting for a hiker
to bring it back to life. It is these traces and the events, recounted
somewhere between forgetting and remembering, which deliver Léopold
Rabus’s works a magical intensity.
.
Léopold has narrated the story of a fox, which entered his garden during
winter. At first he only saw the traces left behind by the fox in the
snow under his fence. That was until one day, he found the fox sleeping
in the corner of the garden: He was old, sick, and knocking on death’s
door. Nevertheless, the fox fled away from its resting place in panic,
frightened by its sudden contact with a person. Two weeks later, the fox
was lying dead elsewhere in the garden. Léopold buried his lifeless
corpse in the forest. What had caused the fox to spend his last few days
in the world of humans, who were foreign and disassociated? A fox
doesn’t feel curious about the other world.
Indeed, the fox crossed the boundary between terra culta and terra
inculta. Yet in the other world, it searched for a place most similar to
its memory: a garden, not a courtyard, nor really home, though neither
somewhere totally unknown. The fox is a boundary crosser.
The fox is a boundary crosser between the worlds of thought. Where the
contours of the past have lost their distinctiveness, it blurs these
with the sequences of a dream. These evolve into images, which transform
the harmless and trusted into the oppressive unknown. Images like those
which nightmarishly appeared during the moment of sweat-breaking fear
flash before a rented eye.
Human figures, which share their origin with the people involved in
Léopold Rabus´s intimate history, appear distorted and grotesque. They
almost seem to be losing their vitality in the process of being
gradually removed from the consciousness of their family and friends,
just like an old tin drum full of scratches and dents and covered in
peeling paint. The almost mortified mechanics of the old wind-up tin
drum can be heard as its wheel is brought into its last stroke before
idleness. Neither dead nor really alive, not forgotten, though without a
future, they appear caught in the moment of transition, thoughtless
behind their milky-white eyes, as if caught in between.
Black romanticism lies behind these works, which are distinctly
concerned with loss and the past, as well as being coupled with
nostalgia, veiling our view of what we perceive as reality. It is
exactly through the small things which he paints – a man feeding his cat,
a lumberjack and his shepherd on their way home, the fox’s burial- that
he has succeeded in freezing the feelings of emptiness behind such acts
perceived as insignificant by the world in their atmosphere of
desolation.
Memento Mori. Carefully mounted in antique frames and ornamented with
garlands of real, braided hair, images of deformed birds, an individual
finger or portraits of rabbits, crows, and squirrels each executed in
the manner of votive paintings are arranged like an ancestral gallery,
to which no-one can no longer relate. The ears of corn, bales of hay,
sickles, and stuffed chickens, speak of an agrarian romanticism, which
somewhat seems fictionally archaic against the bellowing sound speeding
along the street in front of the gallery.
Empathetically and with a touch of black humour, Léopold Rabus
compresses the oppressively-epic relation between humans and nature into
details, among their traces a chain of associations only seldom become
bewildered – bestowing us with a walking stick.
© Katharina Klara Jung, 2008
Translation by Lea-Ann Sakmann
|
|
Léopold Rabus
The surgery of memories |
|
The works of Léopold Rabus are essentially paintings, also creations
using hair, as well as several videos. It is difficult to classify Rabus
in the often-accepted contemporary landscape, as he makes light of
unexpected traditions and techniques to create a remarkable cosmos both
disturbing and seductive.
Léopold Rabus disorientates the observer by the appearance of his works
whose techniques are so traditional but whose subjects are so unusual.
In great part, his opuses are oil paintings and sometimes
waxed-paintings. His explicit references, from a formal point of view,
are those of great paintings. He has an unlimited admiration for Ingres,
Goya and the Pre-Raphaelites. At a moment in which misinformed, but
highly publicized, critics denounce the “gassing of artwork” and the
supposed disappearance of “art’s embodiment”, Léopold Rabus produces
oils on canvas in a purely classical style.
Léopold Rabus paints what seem to be deformed human beings, evolving in
a world of multiple perspectives, in a décor out of space and time. The
characters, who at first appear rather macabre, always seem tensed and
in pain, frozen in uncomfortable positions. Léopold Rabus is not the
first artist to so deform the human body and face. Goya (one thinks of
“Saturne dévorant ses enfants” 1824 [Saturn devouring his children]; “Le
temps ou les vieilles” 1812 [Time or the old ones] and “Caprices” [Whims]),
Schiele or Francis Bacon have chosen as subjects the deformations of the
body and their representation, both magnificent and morbid.
As do these latter, Rabus uses precision and virtuosity in his technique
that has a devastating effect on the spectator’s sensibility. Paintings
also can be scary. The paintings of Léopold Rabus nevertheless do not
represent scenes of war, of death or of disturbing crimes, but rather
characters recalled by the artist or gleaned in family photo albums (sometimes
unknown). Léopold Rabus proposes work essentially based on memory (his
or not), with his capacity for suggesting pictures almost at random in
an original manner, sometimes absurd but always stricking. Dreams are a
good example of this involuntary memory. In this way, Léopold Rabus uses
dreams as tools and delights in representing along with the body of a
deformed dwarf (or what seems to be) that he had seen in his youth, the
Polaroid snapshot of one of his friends’ son. Or again, fascinated by
Swiss forests, he includes in snowy landscapes a minimal backdrop of
mushrooms. The closest thing to this method is surely that of Proust,
deciphering the psychology and the patchwork that represent our thoughts
inundated by memories. But Léopold Rabus carries the analysis all the
way to the scalpel.
As it did with Francis Bacon, using pictures of Muybridge, it is the
position of the body that matters. Remember Bacon, speaking of the
disturbing and stretched mouth of the pope inspired from Velasquez,
saying he’d only wanted to paint a smile. Léopold Rabus has no desire to
shock or horrify. But his pictures are for sure those of monsters.
Literally, a monster is made up of various parts of humans and or
animals (Descartes / Bosch). In his “Meditations” Descartes comments
already on the fact that the imagination proceeds by combinations and
never from “ex-nihilo” creation (out of nothing). Therefore the
monstrous beings created by Léopold Rabus are explicitly humans or
animals, but their eyes, rolling upwards, their complexion, their
dislocated positions prove they are neither normal nor tranquil.
This gap created by Rabus creates a perverse form of attraction towards
these creatures. The seduction wielded by monsters is a known fact :
Hieronymus Bosch was probably the first to use it, but one also thinks
of Pat Andréa or of the horror movies (“Freaks” by Todd Browning,
“Elephant Man” by David Lynch). All in all there is a real attraction
only in a certain repulsion, a paradox largely exploited here. This
magnitude both in the classism of his style (notably the precision of
his technique) and in the actual manner of his work, establish a link
between him and the artist Béatrice Cussol.
Another important point is the presence of natural elements or animals.
Following the great pictorial tradition, Rabus incorporates landscape
elements or parts of still-lives in his compositions (notably mushrooms
or forests). Faithful to his style, the artist uses them in an
exaggerated manner (such as giant mushrooms) with allusions borrowed
from the cinema or from photography (exaggerated and deforming plunging
views). His love of nature includes the natural aspects of the human
body. He uses for example real hair in the compositions under glass in
which he mixes paint and braids of human hair. The piece then becomes
some sort of ex-voto (offering given in order to fulfill a vow). This
type of work has existed for centuries in numerous traditions and
regional folklore. Naturally, Death lurks near these pieces made of the
strangest body part, the hair, which last longer than the flesh and, it
is said, can even keep growing for several weeks on a cadaver.
But above all one must be aware of the derision and irony contained
without a doubt in every one of his pieces. The process becomes clear in
the video “L’eau du Guide” in which Léopold Rabus has chosen to show
chickens following a prophetic guide, half religious, half Zarathousta.
The story is told by a voice off-screen, that of a chicken, recounting
her irrational attraction to a spiritual guide with long hair. One can
only admire the beauty of the scenery, the talent used to write the
texts and to film the video. Nevertheless, Léopold Rabus refuses a
parody and treats it systematically like an imaginary story. This brings
to mind the philosophical process used in the Monty Python “The Meaning
of Life”, treating the most metaphysical subjects with a certain humor.
In his video, Léopold Rabus chooses to depict the attraction that gurus
of all types can have and to inverse the roles by putting chickens in
the place of the gullible faithful. Crowd scenes, seductions and
persuasions, the suicide of a follower; the important elements are not
far behind the mockery, the beauty of the background or of the chickens.
© Sébastien Planas, directeur des Collections de Saint Cyprien
sebastien.planas@collectionsdesaintcyprien.com
|
 |
Léopold Rabus
|
The
pictorial worlds of young Swiss artist Léopold Rabus (*1977, Neuenburg /
Switzerland) defy any clear definition. He plays with clichés, with symbols
and well-known motives, alters them or assigns them a new meaning. His
thematic series engage in aspects of good and bad, of religion and sexuality,
life and death, themes that come to be satirised by the shrill colouring,
the particular materials and the extraordinary luminance of the paintings.
The series „Ex-Voto“, whose title refers to the tradition of votive pictures
dating back to late medieval Italy, depicts this persiflage especially well.
Rabus seizes this tradition with all its iconographic categories and renders
it absurd. Behind the sweet façade of shimmering colours the protagonists’
quibbling meanness reveals. The spectator stands before Rabus’ votives with
mixed emotions between fascination and disgust. With the use of real dark
hair, the surface of the painting receives a haptic quality that stands in
harsh contradiction to the glittering colour of nail polish. Together with
the empty eyes and enormous heads reminding of children’s drawings, it
evokes very ambivalent feelings – intuitive, unsettling and in a way not of
this world.
A similarly idiosyncratic iconography unfolds in the series „Scène Sainte”
from 2004. “I try to capture the very moment when the soul – voluntarily or
not – leaves the body”, Rabus notes on these works. Returning motives
conjure in their different contexts a novel semiotic that abates over usual
connotation like a veil. Whilst winged fawns whir around devoured anemones
in one painting, they are gorged in the next or drink out of the sacred
tears of those left behind in yet another. The fairytale world from
untroubled childhood years is broken, the idyll destroyed. As in the earlier
series, the cheerful colours of the lovingly patterned clothes deceive the
pictures’ philosophical-religious content and thereby quip on their own
message: “The Man lives on his knees, condemns or praises god, a tree, a
bottle, before finally laying down to his last rest: A lowly way of
addressing what he does not understand” (Rabus).
The subtle irony with which Léopold Rabus covers exaggerated devotion is
taken to culmination in his video “L’Eau du Guide” (“the leader’s water”),
in which a preacher explains the beauty of nature to a herd of chicken in
order to illuminate their souls. He carries this motive to the extremes and
erects a shrine for the leader: In a frosted gingerbread house adorned with
marzipan piglets he gathers the (stuffed) chicken around a
fairy-light-draped devotion picture lined with landscape photos strongly
reminding of postcards (Maison Pain, 2004)
In his latest works, the mass of information is reduced and the action
presented in clear but no less complex constellations. The balanced
compositions whisk away the viewer to a world of insect-like meandering
bodies appearing both fragile and menacing in their scarce garment.
The young artist’s unmistakeable style, his manner of combining the
aesthetic with the abysmal, the carnal with the ulterior, his unfolding of
twilight worlds filled with fantasy and ambiguity, the energy and
forcefulness of his paintings bestow his works with a vibrancy whose impact
one can hardly elude. Léopold Rabus does not reinvent painting - he draws on
the plentiful resources of its glorious past and makes the viewer experience
why painting will never be dead.
© Katharina Klara Jung, 2005 |
Read long version.
|
|

|